Hello,
In the midst of an interview process for a QA position at a game studio and have been tasked with writing a response to a prompt that's a bit confusing to me.
The prompt is asking me to explain an understanding of a change (a new character or boss being added to a game), and to write a test plan against that change.
The word that throws me off is the word against. My initial thought process is telling me to list out an example (make a character), create test ideas related to software/game testing (functional testing, ad hoc testing, combinatorial testing, etc) and then list reasonings against adding that character in the game based off results from the test ideas. But maybe I should just list test ideas without explaining reasonings against the new character, as that's more fitting to what I would do in role? To try and break the game with opposing ideas of how the game should behave?
I have no prior QA or testing experience. The deductions I've made so far on how to approach the prompt have been from what I've learned online.
Doing everything I can to take advantage of this opportunity and attempt to move forward in my goal industry, thanks for any thoughts or feedback.
usa jobs resume
usa hotel jobs
usajobs
usa jobs federal government
usa job in ksa
usa jobs
usa jobs login
usa jobs gov
usajobs.gov
www.usajobs.gov
usajobs.com
usajobs
usajobs.gov official
Aucun commentaire: