So I applied for a software dev job. Made it to first round, they seemed very interested as I was a pretty good fit on paper - had a phone interview, they sent me an email about what a 'positive impression' they had and invited me to do an online coding test.
So I took it, it was 3 tasks and unfortunately I messed up the 3rd one. Finished the first with 90% and the second with 100% but for the 3rd I got a 0%, but I still think my approach wasn't wrong I just didn't have time left to finish.
Anyway I was aware that's not a great result but I still had hopes, however the day after I just got a short mail that said 'Unfortunately your coding examples were not convincing' and some formal blah blah about data protection.
I get it, they probably had other applicants who gave a similarly 'positive impression' in the phone interview and reached 90% overall or something so they went ahead with those. For some reason I feel really put off by the tone - 'your examples were not convincing' and now I feel like the worst programmer alive. Maybe I'm just too used to the vague 'we went ahead with a more experienced candidate'-blah.
Am I overthinking this? I probably am.
usa jobs resume
usa hotel jobs
usajobs
usa jobs federal government
usa job in ksa
usa jobs
usa jobs login
usa jobs gov
usajobs.gov
www.usajobs.gov
usajobs.com
usajobs
usajobs.gov official
Aucun commentaire: