I'm curious how many of you have worked both, and why you chose that one. Particularly, I'm curious about how you balance higher pay and such vs stability.
I'm currently working a permanent position (started last week as a rehire lol). Just got an offer for roughly double the pay, but it's a relatively short contract, but it's a higher position than what I'm currently doing. I feel the position title and extra experience can catapult me into a better position in the future, but I'm unsure. Current place is well under the industry standard, maybe even as much as 25%--I never intended to stay here long-term, but I also didn't plan to quit before even getting out of training. New place is above the standard, maybe by as much as 10-20%. It pays a good $15k ($66k associate manager at current place -> $80k for regular analyst for me at new place) more than the managers at my current company despite no managerial responsibilities. I plan to let my current job know only after everything is set in stone with the new position, and to see if they will match the offer or get close (pretty easy to predict they won't), but feel free to provide input on that as well. As a side note if it matters, both of these are fully remote, although the current role technically has a "return to office" in the eventual future... which would not happen for me unless they paid me a good 30% more due to rent increases.
So back to the main question: For those of you that work contracts rather than permanent positions, how do you balance the pay and such against the long-term stability that a regular role has?
usa jobs resume
usa hotel jobs
usajobs
usa jobs federal government
usa job in ksa
usa jobs
usa jobs login
usa jobs gov
usajobs.gov
www.usajobs.gov
usajobs.com
usajobs
usajobs.gov official
Aucun commentaire: