My company was bought out last year and our new company had a say in the results of our employee evaluations and I'm not pleased.
We are rated on a scale of 1 to 5 for different benchmarks and have an overall score at the end. I work in analytics so our benchmarks are pretty arbitrary and there aren't hard numbers to base anything off of.
My boss prefaced my review by giving me a 3 minute speech about the politics going into this. There was manager meeting a few weeks ago and the managers got in trouble for their evaluation scores. Managers were rating their employees based on their actual performance (so giving high scores where appropriate) and the new company says "no, you need to lower the scores, we don't give 4's and 5's."
So I got my evaluation today and I got a 3. My boss said that I had actually scored a 5, but he got yelled at and had to lower the score. I asked what I can do to improve the scores and he said "nothing, you're doing a great job!" The comments in the review are also glowing and have no mention of deficiencies or areas of improvement.
I know evaluations will eventually be linked to bonus incentive pay that the new company offers, so this artificial lower score will decrease my bonus pay. This is infuriating to me since my boss flat out told me I should have been rated higher, but was barred from doing so in the paper review.
Does anyone else work for a company that does this? Do you also find it frustrating or do you just accept it for what it is?
I just want honest reviews and feedback and this false ceiling of 4 or 5's to just be a maintenance level, where if you reach it you should maintain it each year.
usa jobs resume
usa hotel jobs
usajobs
usa jobs federal government
usa job in ksa
usa jobs
usa jobs login
usa jobs gov
usajobs.gov
www.usajobs.gov
usajobs.com
usajobs
usajobs.gov official
Aucun commentaire: